The justices’ precedents imply that he has the power to dismiss officials of ‘independent’ agencies.

The Trump Administration has told the Judiciary Committee that they plan on asking the Supreme Court to overule their ...

The Department of Justice will stop defending legal protections preventing the president from firing members of independent ...

Gwynne Wilcox said her NLRB removal "defies ninety years of Supreme Court precedent that has ensured the independence of ...

This extraordinary act, which was not only contrary to statute but clearly unlawful under a 90-year-old Supreme Court ...

The U.S. Department of Justice will cease defending the independent status of three consumer and worker protection agencies, ...

Wilcox has argued in a lawsuit that her removal violated a federal law that allows a president to oust a board member only ...

Gwynne Wilcox’s lawsuit is the first to challenge the president’s ouster of several members of independent boards — moves ...

President Donald Trump’s purge at independent agencies is putting a target on a nearly 100-year-old Supreme Court precedent ...

The high court’s 1935 ruling in the Humphrey’s Executor case, which has protected federal agency independence, was called out ...

The determination applies to the National Labor Relations Board, U.S. Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Product Safety ...