In the latest twist on the back-and-forth CTA battle, on January 23, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) once again stayed

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) announced on Friday, January 24, 2025, that reporting companies are not currently required to

U.S. Supreme Court stays one lower court’s injunction of the CTA, but another lower court’s order still keeps the Act in suspended animation.

The Supreme Court on Thursday revived a requirement that owners of millions of small businesses register with an arm of the Treasury Department charged with fighting money laundering and other financial crimes.

Small businesses are still not required to register with an agency called the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN — for now

Enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act, which requires millions of companies to disclose their true ownership, remains on hold despite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Treasury Department.

The American-Statesman reached out to immigration advocates and attorneys to ask what advice they are giving to immigrants without legal status.

A Texas Republican congressman is calling for greater cooperation between ICE and local enforcement as the Trump administration launches new raids.

On January 23, 2025, in the case of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al., the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) granted

As I reported Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. et al v. Merrick Garland, Attorney General of the United States

National Cattlemen’s Beef Association Executive Director of Government Affairs Kent Bacus reacted to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to lift the injunction that temporarily halted enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act’s reporting requirements.

A subsequent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturned that injunction, which restored the requirement. Soon after, a separate panel of judges on the Fifth Circuit overturned the decision that lifted the injunction — which, once again, halted implementation of the rule.