The "China Shock" is revisited, and it raises questions about why economists failed to see the costs of free trade.
The first return volley in a new trade clash between China and the United States was fired on Monday as Beijing’s tariffs on nearly $14 billion in US imports came into effect.
Will Trump's steel tariffs curb China’s dominance? US trade restrictions shift supply chains, sparking fears of retaliation ...
When China joined the WTO in 2001 ... This move could create economic instability and encourage U.S. trading partners to look elsewhere. Eschewing negotiation for new trade rules and instead ...
Trade between China and Africa reached more than $295bn in 2024, an increase of 6.1% on the previous year, according to a ...
The Bangkok Post on MSN19h
Navigating ASEAN-China Trade: Opportunities, Risks, and the Path ForwardAs global trade evolves, the ASEAN-China trade relationship has become a vital driver of economic growth in Southeast Asia. Projected to grow at 5.6% annually, trade between the two regions is ...
4don MSN
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that Canada would respond with 25% tariffs "against $155 billion worth of ...
Ghana News Agency (GNA) on MSN1d
Bilateral trade between Ghana, China reaches historic $11.84 billion in 2024Bilateral trade between Ghana and China reached a historic high of $11.84 billion in 2024, marking a significant milestone in the long-standing economic partnership between the two nations.The record ...
Yet amid this uncertainty, it’s possible that there may be a silver lining. Trump may inadvertently be paving the way for a realignment of trade relationships and the emergence of new economic blocs.
The U.S. needs to overhaul its approach to dealing with China’s overcapacity, Aaron L. Friedberg writes in a guest commentary.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback